Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro ANV16-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive354% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro ANV16-41  (all builds)
MotherboardHWK RZ_HKH
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '24 at 03:38
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 46.8
1-Core 187
2-Core 374
100% 202 Pts
4-Core 738
8-Core 1,375
126% 1,057 Pts
64-Core 1,599
99% 1,599 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
Acer(1025 172C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.32
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Lighting 60
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 83.3
49% 56.1 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 94.6
55% 62.4 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2550_MTFDKBA1T0TGE 1TB
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3965 2102 1563 1570 1138 606 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 2,098
Write 4,140
Mixed 2,547
SusWrite 1824
602% 2,652 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 98.4
346% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,395
DQ Write 920
DQ Mixed 1,252
909% 1,189 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 354%
Great: 354%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 47.1
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 37.2
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 21.1
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 49 165 16" 1280 720 AUOD8B1
Typical Nitro ANV16-41 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

System: Acer Nitro ANV16-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback