Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17KK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Alpha 17 C7VG
MotherboardMSI MS-17KK  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '24 at 20:37
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 51.9
1-Core 161
2-Core 316
90% 176 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 416
61% 448 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
MSI(1462 13ED) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.10.20
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
7.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 11.8
6% 10.6 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 19.9
12% 13.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HDLU-00BT7 1TB
888GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXD71W2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 884 880 839 932 2008 2166 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,626
Write 1,880
Mixed 1,498
SusWrite 1,285
406% 1,822 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 53.5
183% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,209
DQ Write 819
DQ Mixed 908
706% 979 MB/s
Poor: 285%
This bench: 285%
Great: 423%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA095N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 31.2
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 44.2
SC Write 42.8
SC Mixed 40.1
121% 42.4 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 17.2" 1280 720 CSO1702 MNH301CA3-1
Typical MS-17KK Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17KK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback