Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-fc0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-fc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B2F
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240605
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateOct 09 '24 at 02:04
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 39.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 193
60% 114 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 446
48% 381 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B2F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.48.07
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 11.4
5% 9.33 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 18.2
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL8512HELU-00BH1 512GB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NKXM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 756 784 368 248 232 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,059
Write 838
Mixed 868
SusWrite 430
179% 799 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 52.3
174% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 668
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 433
322% 438 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 143%
Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G56AK6BX069N 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
65.6% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 24.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 15.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0949
Typical Laptop 15-fc0xxx Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-fc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback