EVGA 132-KS-E277

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEVGA Default string
MotherboardEVGA 132-KS-E277  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '18 at 18:18
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$234
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 96.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 256
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 698
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 744
46% 744 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 200
Parallax 197
148% 193 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 177
Splatting 123
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 EVO 250GB
758GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 504
Write 340
Mixed 347
88% 397 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 20.9
121% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 75.3
91% 158 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85%
Great: 125%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$197
557GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,238
Write 1,489
Mixed 1,261
367% 1,663 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 52
206% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 429
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 135
160% 282 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 259%
Great: 302%
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
449GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 527
Write 414
Mixed 426
101% 456 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 37.9
147% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 128
139% 235 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
223GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 347
Mixed 356
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 25.4
134% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 80.8
109% 202 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$264
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 28.9
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 30.3
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 51.7
77% 51.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 132-KS-E277 Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: EVGA 132-KS-E277

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $912
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback