Asrock A55M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A55M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJan 23 '18 at 04:07
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3800 APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 42.3
2-Core 84.3
42% 65.2 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 163
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 3662) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 39.8
26% 34.7 fps
MRender 40.6
Gravity 38
Splatting 28.3
28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29% Poor
Read 224
Write 132
Mixed 155
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 1.44
37% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 20
DQ Write 63.2
DQ Mixed 2.2
13% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 29%
Great: 78%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
359GB free
Firmware: 3CNR Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 63.1
Write 60.6
Mixed 27
37% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.31
83% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FH8N0QHSCR 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.7
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55M-HVS Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A55M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $121
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback