Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160325
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 24 '18 at 15:56
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 704
69% 564 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 114
Parallax 100
89% 108 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 100
Splatting 82.3
75% 93 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate ST1000DM003-1CH162 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
172GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 72.2
Write 85.6
Mixed 76.9
59% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.25
81% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 57%
WD WD15EADS-22P8B0 1TB
138GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 138
Mixed 97.3
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.25
81% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 79%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
135GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 107
Write 121
Mixed 113
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 2.77
4K Mixed 0.19
113% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 31.8
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 30.6
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $869
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback