Lenovo 37014W1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemLenovo 37014W1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 37014W1
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150109
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateJan 27 '16 at 05:10
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3667U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 87.4
44% 68.9 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 130
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2207) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.7% Terrible
Lighting 3.43
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 1.88
3% 2.82 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 4.26
2% 2.92 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.7%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDMCEAF180A4L 180GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LADi Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 449
Write 187
Mixed 269
66% 302 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 9.04
54% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 17.5
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 8.15
29% 58.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5174BM0-YH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback