Today's hottest deals

Quanta NL5A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQuanta NL5A  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta NL5
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170914
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 26 '18 at 16:22
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 569
58% 467 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Quanta(152D 1158) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 40
12% 23.2 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 25.5
15% 17.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2-2280 256GB 256GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 449
Mixed 479
108% 482 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 44.3
153% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 74.5
99% 181 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75
1TB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 110
Write 87.2
Mixed 66.9
66% 88 MB/s
4K Read 1.07
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.34
128% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NL5A Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Quanta NL5A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback