HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory8.1 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '16 at 20:06
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 81
2-Core 161
59% 103 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 489
49% 398 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
PNY(196E 0995) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5330
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 29
20% 25.4 fps
MRender 32.8
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 24.2
22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Core-0 512GB
182GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.8% Good
Read 504
Write 479
Mixed 490
110% 491 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 8.68
56% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16.9
DQ Write 35.2
DQ Mixed 9.4
12% 20.5 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 67%
V-0 - OS 240GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.8% Good
Read 460
Write 323
Mixed 378
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 9.74
77% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 48.7
DQ Mixed 10.9
16% 29.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$82
849GB free
Firmware: CC32
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 104
Write 99.2
Mixed 84.5
72% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.49
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
272GB free
Firmware: 1H19
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 116
Write 110
Mixed 112
85% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.38
102% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 6.7
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback