Asrock Z97 Extreme6/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Extreme6/3.1  (all builds)
Memory15.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150512
Uptime9.4 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '18 at 02:07
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 224
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 589
61% 492 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 59.6
55% 64.6 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 62
Splatting 51.9
50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
189GB free
Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 167
Write 155
Mixed 127
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 14.5
92% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 41.4
63% 118 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 85%
Mushkin Chronos 120GB-$70
56GB free
Firmware: 501ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.2% Above average
Read 203
Write 119
Mixed 141
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 13
102% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 39.5
58% 110 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 84%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 406
Mixed 417
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 41.5
155% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 105
121% 210 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 134
Write 127
Mixed 123
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.22
98% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$23
305GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 134
Write 88
Mixed 104
82% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.05
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.14
80% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 157
Write 152
Mixed 116
178% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.71
4K Mixed 0.27
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 1352 SUPERTALENT02 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 15.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16.7
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Extreme6/3.1 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme6/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $736
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback