ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 107% UFO	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 109% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z6 G4 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 81C6
Memory	59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171027
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '18 at 18:09
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon Gold 6134 93 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Memory 81.3 1-Core 118 2-Core 235 80% 145 Pts	4-Core 471 8-Core 940 83% 705 Pts	64-Core 1,300 80% 1,300 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 186 Parallax 187 134% 179 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 171 Splatting 122 112% 138 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 4,056 User benchmarks, average bench 250% 840GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXA74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	225% Outstanding	Read 2,406 Write 1,593 Mixed 1,946 440% 1,982 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 46 4K Mixed 23.3 97% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 35.5 DQ Write 73.5 DQ Mixed 24.3 27% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 331%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 384GB free Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 138438184 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1836 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 82764639 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4623 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 994 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 49 504823838 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 23 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 10895 (C2) HDA temperature 30 51 64424509470 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 60584808680507 (F1) Unknown 100 253 8019796537 (F2) Unknown 100 253 12150281308	80.8% Excellent	Read 139 Write 142 Mixed 135 104% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.32 113% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 112%
PNY USB3.0 FD 16GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 14GB free, PID 6008 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	8.27% Terrible	Read 28.7 Write 8.09 Mixed 7.92 15% 14.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.54 4K Write 0.49 4K Mixed 0.38 43% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.27% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GR7AFR4N-VK 4x16GB 150 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 6 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	132% Outstanding	MC Read 68.7 MC Write 49.7 MC Mixed 41.2 152% 53.2 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 17.5 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 48%

Yacht

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

CPU
Xeon Silver 4114IntelBench 65%, 539 samples	61x
Xeon Silver 4108IntelBench 60%, 331 samples	61x
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41081stBench 59%, 156 samples	28x

GPU
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	92x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	48x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	44x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	24x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	21x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	20x

RAM
M393A2K40BB2-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 231 samples	19x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	14x
HMA82GR7AFR4N-VK 4x16GBHynixBench 94%, 150 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback