Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370 42,062 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 83 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 135 59% 96.2 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 379 38% 311 Pts	64-Core 382 24% 382 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C740) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4139 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.09% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 3.59 2% 3.06 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 4.17 3% 3.61 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.09% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2943 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2599 (B1) Unknown 98 98 24 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 53 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 579 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18569003645
Poor: 72% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Kingston 9905428-155.A00LF 16GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	56.4% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 16.8 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 18.9 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	23x
GeForce GT 750MNvidiaBench 8%, 13,088 samples	13x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
MZ7TE256HMHP-00004 256GBSamsungBench 75%, 878 samples	2x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	22x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1119 S939A2SGS-ITR 16GBSamsungBench 50%, 8 samples	2x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GBSamsungBench 50%, 586 samples	2x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $470