Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40 5,908 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 79.6 1-Core 66.6 2-Core 113 54% 86.4 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 280 32% 252 Pts	64-Core 249 15% 249 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6162) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Lighting 71.6 Reflection 72 Parallax 67.9 58% 70.5 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 67.1 Splatting 56.2 52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 EVO 250G 249GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 421 Write 288 Mixed 273 72% 328 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 18.5 92% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 40.6 DQ Write 59.3 DQ Mixed 18.7 23% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 71%
Toshiba MQ02ABF1 1TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 784GB free Firmware: DS001C Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 104 Write 103 Mixed 99.5 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.17 73% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 61%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 779GB free, PID 0216 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 30 Write 28.6 Mixed 18.8 32% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.42 60% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Ramaxel RMR5030ED58E8W1600 Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 14GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.3% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 11.7 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM