Lenovo 20349

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 87% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20349 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lenovo Y50-70 Touch
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '18 at 23:19
Run Duration	100 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%
CPU Throttled	87%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370 42,062 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 64.3 2-Core 134 53% 89.2 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 325 36% 284 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	1.77% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 13.5 Parallax 2.66 1% 5.96 fps	MRender 4.19 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.61 2% 2.98 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.77% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN1T0HMJP-00000 1TB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 733GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV0100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 33 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 20 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 99 99 8 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2837 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 71 62 29 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 16777215 (F1) Unknown 99 99 442 (F2) Unknown 99 99 11 (F9) Unknown 99 99 442	78.8% Very good	Read 484 Write 475 Mixed 495 108% 485 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 18.8 72% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 15.1 60% 133 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GB 5,422 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.7 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 6.6 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 20349 Builds (Compare 344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20349

CPU
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	177x
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	131x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	36x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	212x
GTX 860MNvidiaBench 16%, 18,736 samples	78x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	54x

SSD
MZ7TE512HMHP-000 512GBSamsungBench 75%, 3,033 samples	36x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
Vertex 3 120GBOCZ $42Bench 69%, 25,948 samples	12x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	39x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	34x
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 2x4GBRAMAXELBench 42%, 3,176 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16