Lenovo 20023

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20023  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO NITU1
Memory0.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090821
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '18 at 08:26
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4300
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 27.1
2-Core 38.2
33% 44.5 Pts
4-Core 44.8
8-Core 50.8
6% 47.8 Pts
64-Core 56.8
4% 56.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Legend(17AA 3A02)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.33% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.38 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.52
0% 0.38 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.33%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX PLUS R2 124GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.99 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32% Below average
Read 223
Write 149
Mixed 166
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 5.53
41% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 72.3
DQ Write 30.2
DQ Mixed 6.12
16% 36.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20023 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20023

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback