Today's hottest deals

HP ProLiant ML350 Gen9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP ProLiant ML350 Gen9  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory4.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150720
Uptime62.8 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '18 at 11:09
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 57.6
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 88.7
40% 64.5 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 387
36% 298 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 600GB
59GB free
Firmware: 6.06
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 343
Write 345
Mixed 306
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 2.27
4K Write 8.85
4K Mixed 1.66
10% 4.26 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 9.43
DQ Mixed 3.6
5% 10 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 102%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 300GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.06
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 98%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 90
Write 91.5
Mixed 65.6
104% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.2
59% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 752369-081 2x16GB
2 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.8% Above average
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 20.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 14.3
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML350 Gen9 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: HP ProLiant ML350 Gen9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback