Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu D3091-A1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Fujitsu D3091-A1 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3091-A1
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121205
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '18 at 12:22
Run Duration	293 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 265-$50 677 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Memory 84.3 1-Core 48.7 2-Core 96.8 50% 76.6 Pts	4-Core 96.6 8-Core 97.1 13% 96.8 Pts	64-Core 97.3 6% 97.3 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570 19,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 2206) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	5.6% Terrible	Lighting 7.37 Reflection 7.15 Parallax 6.06 6% 6.86 fps	MRender 6.29 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 5.96 5% 5.88 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.6% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 690GB free Firmware: 2AR2 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 86 86 4457 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5137 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3791 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 13 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2344 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 82 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 53 201864380446 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 509 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 13 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 57377	51.5% Above average	Read 88.9 Write 90.4 Mixed 95.6 69% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.34 83% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 59%
WD WD3200JD-22K 320GB 730 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: 08.0 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 232 183 3400 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10354 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 14994 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 10143 (C2) HDA temperature 119 87 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 15 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29.9% Poor	Read 51.3 Write 53.2 Mixed 50.9 39% 51.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.12 4K Write 0.47 4K Mixed 0.1 24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 36%
USB Flash Disk 2GB 1,397 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	4.38% Terrible	Read 16.1 Write 5.49 Mixed 6.78 10% 9.45 MB/s	4K Read 3.51 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.01 14% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.38% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 1x2GB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.1% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 7.3 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 6.6 20% 6.97 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback