Samsung 530U3C/540U3C/532U3C/532U3X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 530U3C/540U3C/532U3C/532U3X  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP530U3C-KH4CN
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime26.1 Days
Run DateMar 02 '18 at 19:39
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2377M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Memory 22.9
1-Core 32.7
2-Core 64.3
22% 40 Pts
4-Core 57.5
8-Core 70.2
8% 63.8 Pts
64-Core 77.2
5% 77.2 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D7) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 2.19
Parallax 1.22
1% 1.73 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 1
Splatting 3.26
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S3C 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 503
Write 95.2
Mixed 164
55% 254 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 10.3
44% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 70.5
DQ Write 54.6
DQ Mixed 10.8
22% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 92%
Sandisk i110 24GB
22GB free
Firmware: i221004 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 333
Write 73.5
Mixed 120
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 4.88
28% 9.03 MB/s
DQ Read 12.2
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 6.87
7% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 300
13% 300 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U3C/540U3C/532U3C/532U3X Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3C/540U3C/532U3C/532U3X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback