Today's hottest deals

Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '18 at 13:06
Run Duration609 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 198
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 488
54% 426 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
HP(103C 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 3.5
3% 3.98 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 2.83
3% 4.05 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INIC6081SSDWP 128GB
77GB free
Firmware: INICWP00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
102% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 495
Mixed 513
111% 496 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 35.5
144% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 97.1
104% 172 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 93.9
Mixed 93.9
73% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 58%
MXT-USB Storage Device 64GB
8GB free, PID 8816
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
9.2% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 16.6
Mixed 14
21% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.26
4K Write 0.75
4K Mixed 0.62
55% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.2%
Great: 20%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
3GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Read 15.6
Write 1.99
Mixed 3.06
6% 6.88 MB/s
4K Read 4.16
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.005
16% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-138.A 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.2% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback