Gigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151016
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 04 '18 at 16:48
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 192
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 371
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 70.4
Parallax 63.5
58% 68.2 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 58.5
52% 65 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssd2sc12 0GC2DH08T-T 120GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507A
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.5% Above average
Read 479
Write 132
Mixed 162
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 18
85% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 69.9
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 36.8
41% 69.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 57%
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB
152GB free
Firmware: CC37
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 88.8
Write 86.8
Mixed 74.8
63% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.39
89% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS8213.C8FADP Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback