Biostar H67MH

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar H67MH (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111220
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '18 at 06:32
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 83.8 2-Core 169 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 336 45% 334 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Biostar(1565 110D) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.16% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 1.65 Parallax 1.09 1% 1.33 fps	MRender 2.05 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 2.26 2% 1.74 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.16% Great: 1%
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% XFX(1682 3264) 2GB CLim: 430 MHz, MLim: 600 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Lighting 12.9 Reflection 13.9 Parallax 15.5 10% 14.1 fps	MRender 12.6 Gravity 10.2 Splatting 16.4 11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mediatech SSD 120GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW5.0.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 5818104 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 122578366647925 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3831 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 579 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5818104 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5818104 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5818104 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 23547 (EA) Unknown 0 0 20980 (F1) Unknown 0 0 20980 (F2) Unknown 0 0 48861	31.7% Below average	Read 171 Write 76.8 Mixed 67.9 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 8.04 64% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 14 DQ Write 72.8 DQ Mixed 6.27 16% 31 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 51%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20 5,436 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 45GB free Firmware: JP1OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 108 (03) Spinup time 114 114 17193173192 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7208 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 24075 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2089 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7239 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7239 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 197570002984 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 10	54.7% Above average	Read 91.5 Write 99.1 Mixed 70.5 65% 87 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.26 67% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 75%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$59 19,180 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 14GB free Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 99 11260001 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9982 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 457336440 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 35983 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4507 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 86 176096346206 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 48 656146471 (C2) HDA temperature 39 52 90194313255 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 43 24 11260001 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 159 4297 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -130820408818077 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1967680932 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1765922138	63.8% Good	Read 113 Write 109 Mixed 80 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.52 112% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB 1,087 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 14.1 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67MH Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Biostar H67MH

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	8x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	7x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	3x

SSD
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	7x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	4x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $40Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x

RAM
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73EB0-CK0 16GBSamsungBench 54%, 239 samples	10x
HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB F3-1600C11-8GNT 16GBHynixBench 44%, 4 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $200

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383