Today's hottest deals

Samsung 500T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemSamsung 500T  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG XE500T1C-H01TH
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140219
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMar 26 '18 at 21:51
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z2760
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Memory 30.2
1-Core 7.8
2-Core 13.6
13% 17.2 Pts
4-Core 20.4
8-Core 22.3
3% 21.3 Pts
64-Core 25.4
2% 25.4 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 20%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator
Sanyo(144D C0D6)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.14.3.1177
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.47
1% 0.67 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SEM64G 63GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.0
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 61.3
Write 19.6
Mixed 27.8
27% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.58
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 1.84
477% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz clocked @ 1 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.04% Terrible
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3
9% 3.1 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2
5% 1.83 GB/s
Latency 253
16% 253 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.04%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback