Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20AWS0VK00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20AWS0VK00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20AWS0VK00
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140114
Uptime9.5 Days
Run DateMar 29 '18 at 06:46
Run Duration406 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 152
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 242
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4414
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 6.34
3% 5.79 fps
MRender 7.48
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.3
5% 6.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 494
Write 144
Mixed 236
63% 291 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 5.56
70% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 8.6
54% 121 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 86%
ST1000DM 003-1ER162 1TB
876GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 25.7
Write 21.7
Mixed 12.4
24% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.23
80% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 78%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
26GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Read 30.8
Write 6.63
Mixed 10
16% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20AWS0VK00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20AWS0VK00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback