Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemTHIRDWAVE Diginnos PC
MotherboardASUSTeK H170-PRO
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160118
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateMar 31 '18 at 20:15
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 210
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 581
58% 475 Pts
64-Core 609
38% 609 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 144
Parallax 127
112% 136 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 132
Splatting 110
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate ST3000DM001-1ER166 (TurboPC EX) 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 155
Mixed 156
120% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.22
88% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92%
Great: 102%
BUFFALO HD-GDU3 USB Device (TurboPC EX) 3TB
648GB free, PID 0235
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
397% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 398
Mixed 241
390% 285 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 10.1
3,460% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 15.6
4,146% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 397%
Great: 397%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.9% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 22
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 20.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback