Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B85M-HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-HD3  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1176 x 664 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140619
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 01 '18 at 17:13
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 202
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 377
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 17.1
16% 17.8 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 17.1
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
455GB free
Firmware: GM4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 85.1
Write 86.7
Mixed 87.7
65% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.48
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$14
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 107
Write 74.6
Mixed 72.7
63% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.26
64% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 88%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
272GB free, PID 0571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 40.9
Mixed 39.3
52% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.17
45% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
1GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 36.9
Mixed 6.87
32% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.17
4K Write 4.52
4K Mixed 0.41
172% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-HD3 Builds (Compare 1,505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-HD3 - $152

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback