Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151208
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '18 at 12:16
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 78.5 2-Core 183 64% 113 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 473 50% 398 Pts	64-Core 491 30% 491 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro W7100 840 User benchmarks, average bench 30% AMD(1002 030C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 920 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Lighting 40.8 Reflection 48 Parallax 50.8 33% 46.5 fps	MRender 45.4 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 34.2 31% 38.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
C400-MTFDDAC256M 256GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0D09 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.9% Above average	Read 265 Write 236 Mixed 252 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 6.97 78% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 7.62 36% 79.9 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 65%
Toshiba MK6461GS 640GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 511GB free Firmware: 0K Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2334 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 422 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 2213 (0A) Spinup retry count 108 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 377 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 18773 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 249109151769 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 8371 (DE) Loaded hours 96 96 1976 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 348 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	61.3% Good	Read 105 Write 108 Mixed 103 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.38 97% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC72C8PG0N 8x4GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	88.4% Excellent	MC Read 33.9 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 33.9 101% 35.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 10.4 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	23x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	3x

SSD
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	3x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	3x
Vector 256GBOCZ $240Bench 93%, 2,095 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	3x
M391B5273DH0- 8x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 37 samples	3x
M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GBSamsungBench 82%, 5 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16