Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '18 at 14:04
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$449
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 223
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 832
76% 636 Pts
64-Core 1477
91% 1477 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 70
Parallax 98.3
60% 80.6 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 57.6
53% 66.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9260-8i 18TB
993GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD My Passport 0743 1TB
919GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 107
Write 106
Mixed 55.1
110% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.24
60% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%
JetFlash Transcend 2GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
7.51% Terrible
Read 29.3
Write 6.24
Mixed 9.6
15% 15 MB/s
4K Read 7.95
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
30% 2.66 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.51%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 53.7
MC Write 51.2
MC Mixed 43.9
142% 49.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 124%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback