HP 3105m

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP 3105m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1611
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110707
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 03 '18 at 06:59
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-350
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 53.5
1-Core 19.7
2-Core 38.3
27% 37.2 Pts
4-Core 38
8-Core 38
5% 38 Pts
64-Core 38.3
2% 38.3 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
HP(103C 1611) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.21 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SS DSA2M160G2GN 160GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 231
Write 94.2
Mixed 144
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 5.34
4K Write 7.11
4K Mixed 3.67
17% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-040.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.7
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3105m Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 3105m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback