HP p6-2310ea

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP p6-2310ea  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120824
Uptime20.1 Days
Run DateApr 06 '18 at 18:22
Run Duration347 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300 APU-$36
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 52.9
2-Core 84.7
41% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 76.9
8-Core 88.9
11% 82.9 Pts
64-Core 78.4
5% 78.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
HP(103C 2AE0) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.1.1000
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 2.73
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 2.22
2% 3 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 4.48
3% 3.35 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 960GB-$80
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 458
Write 236
Mixed 259
70% 318 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 18.7
78% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 47.2
DQ Mixed 29.3
37% 67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 38.4
Write 34.6
Mixed 34.9
27% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 3.78
4K Mixed 0.41
142% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
398GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 102
Write 111
Mixed 104
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.37
102% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 69%
iStorage diskAshur 3TB
2TB free, PID 0316
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.5% Good
Read 159
Write 167
Mixed 76.8
165% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.21
77% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 66%
iStorage diskAshur 2TB
1TB free, PID 0317
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.8% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 36.7
Mixed 35.7
46% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.26
62% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 56%
iStorage diskAshur 1TB
607GB free, PID 0317
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 88.6
Write 79.4
Mixed 63.7
96% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.15
56% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 43%
Corsair Padlock v2 16GB
9GB free, PID 1ab5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
7.37% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 8.37
Mixed 12.2
16% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.02
4K Write 0.59
4K Mixed 0.68
50% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.37%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.4% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.8
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2310ea Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2310ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $36
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback