Asrock IMB-183

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock IMB-183  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 03:53
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4350T
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 183
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 244
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD6570
Sapphire(174B E181) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 6.13
Reflection 6.92
Parallax 4.94
5% 6 fps
MRender 6.67
Gravity 4.17
Splatting 6.09
5% 5.64 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
128gb SATA FLASH DRIVE 128GB
98GB free
Firmware: SFPS925A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 326
Write 166
Mixed 7.8
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 4.63
60% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 79
DQ Mixed 1.11
28% 69.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 80%
SFSA060GU2AA2TO-I-LB-216-ATC 60GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBR11015 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.5% Above average
Read 258
Write 89
Mixed 126
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 25.8
94% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 83.7
DQ Mixed 45.3
56% 101 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown i-DIMM D3SH12082XH12AA 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31% Below average
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IMB-183 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock IMB-183

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback