Samsung 305V4A/305V5A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSamsung 305V4A/305V5A  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 305V4A/305V4A
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '18 at 14:15
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3430MX APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 47.6
1-Core 12.5
2-Core 24.9
22% 28.3 Pts
4-Core 47.8
8-Core 46.7
6% 47.2 Pts
64-Core 49.7
3% 49.7 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Sanyo(144D C608) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 1.78
2% 2.34 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.59 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 79.3
Write 85.6
Mixed 75.7
60% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.31
73% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CM0-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 305V4A/305V5A Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 305V4A/305V5A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback