Today's hottest deals

HP dx2000 MT(DY925AV)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP dx2000 MT(DY925AV)  (all builds)
MotherboardLite-On 08FCh
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20040826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '16 at 14:21
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
mPGA478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 22.6
2-Core 33.9
34% 44 Pts
4-Core 33.9
8-Core 30.3
4% 32.1 Pts
64-Core 34
2% 34 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6Y080L0 80GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: YAR41BW0 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 45.4
Write 43.4
Mixed 29.6
29% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.46
108% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 32%
Corsair VoyagerGT 16GB
6GB free, PID 1a90
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Read 27.6
Write 7.29
Mixed 11.1
16% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.004
4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x0.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.2
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback