Today's hottest deals

Asus M4N68T-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4N68T-M  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110705
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 29 '18 at 09:24
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 945
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 90.2
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 88
50% 73.9 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 175
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gainward(10B0 0FC6) 1GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 397.31
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.23% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 12.2
8% 10.7 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 13.3
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.23%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.9% Average
Read 256
Write 126
Mixed 99.3
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 14.1
81% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32.8
DQ Write 71.7
DQ Mixed 12.1
21% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung HD501LJ 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 188
Mixed 178
138% 184 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.22
85% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
34.4% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 12.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.9
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N68T-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback