Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion KC878AA-ABA m8307c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHp-pavilion KC878AA-ABA m8307c  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Benicia
Memory2.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080117
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 03 '18 at 13:39
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 26.7
2-Core 54.3
34% 49.1 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 108
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 82GB-$33
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PF2O Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 50.4
Write 31.3
Mixed 33.7
29% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.21
58% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 32%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
4TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 30.6
Write 27.5
Mixed 8.07
26% 22 MB/s
4K Read 1.76
4K Write 4.12
4K Mixed 0.5
164% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 72%
Generic USB SD Reader 64GB
15GB free, PID 6377
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Read 8.25
Write 9.28
Mixed 8.19
11% 8.57 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.72
4K Mixed 0.35
47% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KC878AA-ABA m8307c Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion KC878AA-ABA m8307c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $64
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback