Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31225 3,353 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 86.1 2-Core 167 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 339 44% 334 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210 3,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1B0A 9045) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 275.88 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.14% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.46 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.14% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150 19,279 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 541GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2O Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 143 Write 157 Mixed 130 108% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.13 45% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325U7BFR8A-H9 4x2GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	52.1% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.6 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.1 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	9x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	9x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 1,553 samples	7x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28