ADD TO PC
BUILD

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '13 at 10:59
Run Duration	104 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 87.8 2-Core 176 60% 132 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 345 45% 337 Pts	64-Core 341 21% 341 Pts
Poor: 44% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 115GB 2,637 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 11GB free Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 5 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 220 74 0 (0C) Power cycle count 41 7 0 (B8) Unknown 6 0 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 0 0 (C4) Reallocation count 0 0 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 0 0 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 48 237 196121 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 18 32 99900 (C8) Write error rate 3 253 4806 (C9) Soft read error rate 114 224 2396 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 185 245 2089 (CB) Run out cancel 1 191 53730 (CC) Soft ECC correction 0 0 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 160 134 1 (CE) Flying height 0 0 0 (CF) Spin high current 13 210 0 (D0) Spin buzz 95 162 1 (D1) Offline seek performance 249 255 65535	16% Very poor	Read 103 Write 59.2 Mixed 62.8 17% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.67 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 3.62 29% 13.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 49%
Ocz-vertex v1.10 32GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 10GB free Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 100 14387124 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 117664924052598 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 951 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 49 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 129 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 106 100 14387124 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11136 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5696 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5696 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10752	6.76% Terrible	Read 55.5 Write 20.4 Mixed 60.4 10% 45.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 1.23 12% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.76% Great: 31%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 239552904 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 84 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 62 60 1696259 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1590 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 84 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 59 538050592 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2577 (C2) HDA temperature 32 41 73014444064 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 24674587116912 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4111851158 (F2) Unknown 100 253 734987380	84.1% Excellent	Read 133 Write 160 Mixed 141 109% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.18 73% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 157GB free Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 194090544 (03) Spinup time 92 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 548 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 20573749 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7553 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 485 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 49 622067749 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 95 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 75 75 50066 (C2) HDA temperature 37 51 81604378661 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -124579821383835 (F1) Unknown 100 253 468009148171 (F2) Unknown 100 253 644744003704	50.6% Above average	Read 67.8 Write 108 Mixed 96.7 69% 91 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.36 95% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	725x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	285x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	273x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	624x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	138x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	308x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback