Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP x2 Detachable 10-p0XX (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 827C
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180117
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	May 19 '18 at 15:36
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	78%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 9,056 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 46.1 1-Core 16.8 2-Core 33.8 23% 32.2 Pts	4-Core 66.9 8-Core 64.4 9% 65.7 Pts	64-Core 65.4 4% 65.4 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 827C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4463 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.17% Terrible	Lighting 1.27 Reflection 1.92 Parallax 2.03 1% 1.74 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 2.09 1% 1.72 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.17% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba 128G32 125GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.0 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Read 142 Write 82.1 Mixed 101 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 4.76 35% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 10.4 DQ Write 35.2 DQ Mixed 3.93 8% 16.5 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 31%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 1,009 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 1607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	7.25% Terrible	Read 20.2 Write 12.4 Mixed 14.6 19% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.47 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.02 26% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.25% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 1x4GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	20% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 6.6 21% 7.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 176 23% 176 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM