User System

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Default Default string
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	720 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180323
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '18 at 23:07
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core m3-7Y30 4,585 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Memory 75.3 1-Core 79 2-Core 142 59% 98.9 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 189 27% 200 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 11,115 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.74% Terrible	Lighting 6.03 Reflection 8.38 Parallax 5.78 5% 6.73 fps	MRender 8.29 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 12 7% 8.55 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.74% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SMAT128G1122 128GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2333000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 9 100 9 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 82 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 29 (A9) Unknown 100 100 51 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 14 (AE) Unknown 100 100 14 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 50 100 287762808882 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 58 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1462 (F1) Unknown 253 253 497 (F2) Unknown 253 253 329	44.3% Average	Read 418 Write 173 Mixed 251 62% 281 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 58 4K Mixed 3.22 55% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 61.3 DQ Mixed 3.55 14% 29.4 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 70%
Generic SC200 SD Card 197GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 144GB free Firmware: 8.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 33%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 3,622 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 80GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 125 Write 41.8 Mixed 51.1 77% 72.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.77 4K Write 1.04 4K Mixed 0.29 67% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GB 211 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	63.9% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 21.6 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 17.8 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 89.8 44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)