Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro11,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro11,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-189A3D4F975D5FFC
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '18 at 15:33
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4278U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 160
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 223
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz)
Apple(106B 011A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4240
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 7.15
Parallax 9.25
5% 7.63 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 10.3
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
277GB free (System drive), PID 3940
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 97
Write 83.6
Mixed 57.4
97% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.41
64% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro11,1 Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro11,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback