Today's hottest deals

Asrock J3160-ITX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock J3160-ITX  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180227
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 18 '18 at 08:27
Run Duration65122 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3160
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Memory 26.7
1-Core 6.8
2-Core 28.4
14% 20.6 Pts
4-Core 90.1
8-Core 89.4
12% 89.8 Pts
64-Core 89.2
6% 89.2 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 472
Write 419
Mixed 351
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 9.27
4K Mixed 5.89
22% 7.16 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 40.6
DQ Mixed 12
14% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 103%
Intel 330 Series 180GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 305
Write 166
Mixed 219
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 8.23
42% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 27.3
DQ Mixed 14.4
14% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 83%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 275
15% 275 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J3160-ITX Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J3160-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback