Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '18 at 20:44
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 35.7
2-Core 70
36% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 67.9
8-Core 75.1
9% 71.5 Pts
64-Core 77.5
5% 77.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 0.22
1% 0.93 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asrock RAM Disk 1GB
0GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Nvidia STRIPE 298.10G 320GB
198GB free (System drive)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 102
Mixed 107
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.43
95% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 88%
Nvidia STRIPE 596.18G 640GB
88GB free
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 94.7
Write 67.4
Mixed 66.3
57% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.35
94% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback