Monster TULPAR T7 V15.1

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V15.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook TULPAR T7 V15.1
Memory	59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '18 at 19:23
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Memory 91.7 1-Core 143 2-Core 279 95% 171 Pts	4-Core 543 8-Core 797 84% 670 Pts	64-Core 987 61% 987 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Clevo(1558 7710) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.73 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 126 Parallax 98.9 88% 111 fps	MRender 90.5 Gravity 101 Splatting 103 81% 97.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 349GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5163 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1415 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 47 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4221577419	97.8% Outstanding	Read 525 Write 409 Mixed 422 100% 452 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 84.9 4K Mixed 24.9 137% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 24.4 83% 182 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 135%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 6,967 User benchmarks, average bench 225% 262GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXY7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	196% Outstanding	Read 2,040 Write 812 Mixed 730 260% 1,194 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 52.7 196% 69.9 MB/s	DQ Read 55.3 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 32.7 42% 71.6 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 294%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 251GB free Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	263% Outstanding	Read 2,339 Write 1,449 Mixed 1,659 402% 1,816 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 54.5 209% 78.3 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 428 DQ Mixed 224 213% 329 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 263% Great: 283%
Crucial M500 960GB-$59 4,389 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 71GB free Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4116 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3049 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 19 (AE) Unknown 100 100 67 (B4) Unknown 0 0 16523 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 42 249108103204 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 16 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 13477850355 (F7) Unknown 100 100 427261820 (F8) Unknown 100 100 678823901	93.9% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 407 Mixed 442 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 99.1 4K Mixed 25.4 122% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 13.8 87% 200 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-2400C16-16GRS 859B BLS16G4S240FSD.16FBD 04CD F4-2400C16-16GRS 859B BLS16G4S240FSD.16FBR 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 26.9 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 26.4 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V15.1 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V15.1

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	22x
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	23x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	1x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	4x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	4x
XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdata $40Bench 119%, 8,737 samples	3x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	6x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x
F4 DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 82%, 2,421 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $193

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16