Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus M4N68T-M

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4N68T-M (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '18 at 18:39
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	MDA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 88.3 1-Core 47.2 2-Core 93.8 51% 76.4 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 186 25% 184 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 841F) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 358.50 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	28.4% Poor	Lighting 35.7 Reflection 33.1 Parallax 40.7 29% 36.5 fps	MRender 40.3 Gravity 32.6 Splatting 28.1 27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssd2sc24 0G1CS1754D11 240GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 188 183 187 188 187 MB/s Performing below potential (98^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.7% Above average	Read 222 Write 185 Mixed 175 SusWrite 178 43% 190 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 75.8 4K Mixed 26.6 104% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 41 40% 60.9 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 55%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 13GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.7 8.2 8.8 8.5 8.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 15.8 Write 10.5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 8.5 12% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 13.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 9.5 21% 7.5 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4N68T-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	3x
Athlon II X4 630AMDBench 45%, 7,197 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	3x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	3x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
SS DSA2BW120G3 120GBIntelBench 34%, 12 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	7x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	6x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $126

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370