IBM System x3650 M4: -[7915B2M]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemIBM System x3650 M4: -[7915B2M]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 00Y8494
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20180223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '18 at 07:50
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 85
1-Core 92
2-Core 172
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 661
60% 504 Pts
64-Core 2,166
134% 2,166 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 299GB
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 120 117 119 121 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,930
Write 2,695
Mixed 2,901
SusWrite 122
483% 2,162 MB/s
4K Read 100
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 105
351% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 289
218% 291 MB/s
Poor: 171%
This bench: 247%
Great: 247%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4 4 4.1 3.9 4 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.18% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 2.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.9
6% 6.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.18%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF1G72PZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.3% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.4
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback