Asrock 990FX Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '18 at 09:01
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 136
59% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 411
41% 334 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 295 (SLI Disabled)
Nvidia(10DE 0705) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 5.06
17% 11.4 fps
MRender 8.57
Gravity 8.93
Splatting 6.09
6% 7.86 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RHDM2DDHP3A1-N3A8 127GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0530C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 187 184 185 185 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 399
Write 322
Mixed 270
SusWrite 197
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 37
115% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 33.9
DQ Write 59.8
DQ Mixed 39.1
32% 44.3 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-038.A00LF 9905474-059.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.9% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme4 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $604
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback