Sony SVP1122A1J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony SVP1122A1J  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '18 at 19:29
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4650U
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 154
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 187
28% 201 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Sony(104D 90B5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.33
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 5.34
3% 4.28 fps
MRender 5.29
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 6.7
4% 4.78 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE256HMHP-000SO 256GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT25S0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 230 233 234 235 231 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 456
Write 227
Mixed 176
SusWrite 231
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 28.8
130% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 76.9
116% 222 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 14.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback