Asrock N68-GS4 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150408
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 13 '18 at 20:06
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 113
56% 88.1 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 349
35% 283 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
PNY(196E 1130) 1GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 3.62
3% 3.72 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.27
Splatting 5.17
4% 4.15 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dc-154 Mirror Set 0 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 43 43 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.2% Poor
Read 77.4
Write 41.8
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 42.1
12% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 16.7
58% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.2
DQ Write 34.8
DQ Mixed 31.7
24% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 26%
Nvidia STRIPE 1.36T 1.5TB
1.5TB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 197 204 213 210 209 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 197
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 202
126% 172 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.4
255% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 113%
Great: 127%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
169GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 64 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61% Good
Read 148
Write 111
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 64.6
73% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
399GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 64 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 140
Write 111
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 64.6
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 112%
Plugable USB3-SATA-U3 1TB
298GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 52 49 47 49 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 97.8
Write 51.6
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 48.2
76% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG Hynix HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.6
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback