Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8179
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160526
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '18 at 13:45
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 39.8
2-Core 73.2
40% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 225
23% 185 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
HP(103C 8179) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8912
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 20.3
15% 18.6 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 17.4
18% 22 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV512HDGL-000H1 512GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW24H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 139 124 114 130 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 331
Write 320
Mixed 261
SusWrite 136
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 12.7
48% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 268
197% 261 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT41K512M8RG-107:N 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.1
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 7.1
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN Notebook Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback