UserBenchmark: Crucial M500 vs Kingston HyperX 3K

SSD
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR SSD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

KingstonSH103S3/240G

BUY • $70

CrucialCT240M500SSD1

BUY • $79

BenchYourSSD

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 59,274 user samples

Benchmark your SSD here

27,495 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 94% 1TB free
Worst Bench: 59% 25GB free (System drive)

Poor: 59% Great: 94%

SPEED RANK: 479^th / 1074

31,779 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 91% 121GB free
Worst Bench: 57% 90GB free (System drive)

Poor: 57% Great: 91%

SPEED RANK: 545^th / 1074


Effective Speed Effective SSD Speed		80.6 %	Slightly faster effective speed. +5%		76.6 %


Read Avg. Sequential Read Speed	375 MB/s		413 MB/s	Faster read speed. +10%
Write Avg. Sequential Write Speed	243 MB/s		256 MB/s	Slightly faster write speed. +5%
4K Read Avg. 4K Random Read Speed	31.2 MB/s	Much faster random read. +36%	22.9 MB/s
4K Write Avg. 4K Random Write Speed	82.3 MB/s	+1%	81.1 MB/s
Mixed Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed	274 MB/s		291 MB/s	Slightly faster mixed IO speed. +6%
4K Mixed Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed	40.2 MB/s	Faster random mixed IO. +26%	31.9 MB/s
SusWrite Avg. Sustained Write Speed	183 MB/s		194 MB/s	Slightly faster sustained write speed. +6%


Read Peak Sequential Read Speed	442 MB/s		442 MB/s
Write Peak Sequential Write Speed	281 MB/s	+2%	276 MB/s
4K Read Peak 4K Random Read Speed	37.8 MB/s	Much faster peak random read. +43%	26.5 MB/s
4K Write Peak 4K Random Write Speed	112 MB/s		116 MB/s	+4%
Mixed Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed	312 MB/s	+1%	310 MB/s
4K Mixed Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed	49.6 MB/s	Faster peak random mixed IO. +29%	38.4 MB/s
SusWrite Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average	221 MB/s		272 MB/s	Faster peak sustained write speed. +23%

Market Share

Based on 75,950,234 SSDs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.03 %	Hugely higher market share. +200%	0.01 %
Value Value For Money	13.2 %	Better value. +15%	11.5 %
User Rating UBM User Rating	53 %		54 %	+2%
Price Price (score)	$70	Cheaper. +11%	$79


Age Newest	145 Months		134 Months	Slightly more recent. +8%
DQ Read Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed	298 MB/s		328 MB/s	Faster peak deep queue read. +10%
DQ Write Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed	264 MB/s		264 MB/s
AS-SSD Total AS-SSD Total Score	985 Pts		1,011 Pts	+3%
DQ Mixed Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed	289 MB/s	Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO. +54%	188 MB/s
ADQ Read Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed	258 MB/s		296 MB/s	Faster deep queue read. +15%
ADQ Write Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed	209 MB/s		238 MB/s	Faster deep queue write. +14%
ADQ Mixed Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed	223 MB/s	Much faster deep queue mixed IO. +34%	166 MB/s


Capacity Capacity			240GB			240GB

The HyperX 3K is an updated version of the regular HyperX, the only difference between the two SSDs is the grade of NAND flash. The regular HyperX's NAND flash is rated at 5,000 erase cycles vs 3,000 on the 3K version so broadly speaking the number of erase cycles before drive failure on the newer drive is approximately 40% less than on the original HyperX. The distinction is largely irrelevant for consumer users because even after 10 years neither of the drives are likely to come even close to their maximum number of erase cycles. As expected both HyperX's have very similar performance profiles which can be seen in this direct comparison of the two drives. Although the HyperX SSDs were strong contenders on release they are showing their age now and can no longer compete amongst the newer drives from Samsung and Plextor which are both cheaper and faster. ^{[Jan '14 SSDrivePro]}

MORE DETAILS

We had high expectations for the Crucial M500. Crucial have a long history of producing outstanding Solid State drives. Both the RealSSD 300 and the M4, three and two years old, were almost legendary in terms of reliability and performance. The M500 falls far short of our expectations. The drive is relatively cheap and as such we were expecting to compromise on performance but the M500 just falls too far short. With a Real World Performance of 377.5 MBps which is in the bottom 40% and an AS-SSD score of 901 points (50th percentile) the M500 demonstrates relatively weak real world and average server performance. The M500 is competing with the Sandisk Ultra which manages to squeeze out significantly more performance despite sitting in the same price bracket. ^{[Jun '13 SSDrivePro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these SSDs

Top Builds that include these SSDs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. ^[SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Storage Devices FAQ

What is sustained sequential write speed?

What’s the difference between SLC, MLC and TLC?

What is 3D XPoint and how fast is it?

What’s the difference between SATA, PCIe and NVMe?

What’s the difference between NAND and V-NAND?

What is sequential write speed?

What is sequential read speed?

What is incompressible data?

What is queue depth?

Solid State Drives

What is the SSD value for money rating?

What is 4K 64 thread write speed?

Can CPU power saving states (C1,C2,C3) impact SSD speed?

What is the effective SSD speed index?

How is the AS SSD write score calculated?

How is the AS SSD read score calculated?

How is the AS SSD total score calculated?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback