Today's hottest deals
SamsungMZ-75E250B
CrucialCT256M550SSD1
$152

Controller: Samsung Dual Core MGX. Memory: Samsung 40nm TLC V-NAND. Release date: Q4 2014.

 $152 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9189. Flash Memory: Micron Synchronous 20nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 959,924 user samples
951,591 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 124% 140GB free
Worst Bench: 72% 233GB free
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
SPEED RANK: 251st / 1080
8,333 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% 106GB free
Worst Bench: 60% 231GB free
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 328th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
103 % Faster effective speed.
+14%
90.5 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
466 MB/s Faster read speed.
+11%
418 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
434 MB/s +4% 416 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
39.4 MB/s Much faster random read.
+45%
27.1 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
94.6 MB/s Faster random write.
+11%
85 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
370 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+24%
299 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
52.2 MB/s Much faster random mixed IO.
+38%
37.9 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
247 MB/s 311 MB/s Faster sustained write speed.
+26%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
507 MB/s Slightly faster peak read speed.
+9%
466 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
492 MB/s +5% 470 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
47.6 MB/s Much faster peak random read.
+49%
31.9 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
129 MB/s Slightly faster peak random write.
+9%
118 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
416 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+25%
333 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
64.6 MB/s Much faster peak random mixed IO.
+39%
46.4 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
328 MB/s 459 MB/s Much faster peak sustained write speed.
+40%
Market Share
Based on 77,607,474 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.7 % Insanely higher market share.
+6,900%
0.01 %
Value
Value For Money
13.4 % Much better value.
+54%
8.68 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
56 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
52 %
Price
Price (score)
$100 Much cheaper.
+34%
$152
Age
Newest
119 Months Slightly more recent.
+7%
128 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
386 MB/s 387 MB/s +0%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
362 MB/s +0% 361 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,290 Pts +4% 1,240 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
370 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+54%
240 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
354 MB/s Faster deep queue read.
+14%
311 MB/s
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
308 MB/s Slightly faster deep queue write.
+9%
282 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
320 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
+59%
201 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
250GB 256GB

The 250GB Samsung 850 Evo has a similar architecture to its hugely successful predecessor, the 840 Evo. Both drives are TLC based but the 850 uses 3D V-NAND as opposed to regular NAND. Both drives also feature a Turbowrite cache (TWC) which buffers up to 3GB of writes. The TWC enables high burst write speeds but when the cache exhausts write speeds drop to 300 MB/s. Comparing the 850 and 840 Evos shows that effective speed, has improved by 11% and the warranty has been extended from three to five years but prices are also up by 11%. The 850 Evo does put in superb benchmarks (second only to the 850 Pro) but these are only valid within the TWC. At current price levels the 850 Evo struggles to compete with the value leaders[Dec '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 256GB Crucial M550 is a welcome improvement over the 240GB M500. The new Marvel 88SS9189 controller has addressed our primary concern with the M500 which was poor sequential write speed. With sequential read/write speeds of 510/478 MB/s the M550 has a healthy core performance profile. Comparing the M550 and M500 shows that the new M550 leads on nearly every single performance metric. Unfortunately the M550 is priced significantly higher than the M500 but prices will likely drop as retailers build up stocks of the new M550. A key comparable for the M550 is the similarly priced market leading Samsung Evo. Comparing the Evo and M550 shows that the Evo is around 11% slower in terms of effective speed[Mar '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback